Swimming Blogs - Chris DeSantis


« older | newer »

Making the picks

Chris DeSantis | Profile
June 26, 2008

So, if you read my blog post a couple of weeks ago, you know that i have challenged swimming television star Mike Gustafson to a high stakes game of picking trials finishes. Soon after we traded boastful blog posts I called Mike to hammer out the details for our pick off. Not content to pick just who would qualify in each event or go one place extra as in Swimnetwork's Fantaswim, Mike and I agreed to go out to an astounding eight places in each event. For all 26 events that will be contested in Omaha, we would each attempt to guess the exact finishing order of the championship final. I relished the chance to pour over the psyche sheets systematically. I figured that there was no way Mike, by now nearly half a year into an erratic cross country journey, could stay current enough in results to have any clue who would finish beyond 4th. I nearly ordered a victory cigar before i realized I never smoke. Then I started to work on my picks.

Almost immediately my honed system for making picks went out the window. I quickly discovered that in almost every race, I liked about five different people to finish in the top two. To further complicate matters, I agonized over leaving anyone seeded in the top eight out of my championship final, even though. After completing just four events I was already regretting my decision to go out to eight. My earlier delusions of grandeur gave way to thoughts of a cackling Chris Michael celebrating my defeat at the hands of Gus.

Eventually I got myself refocused on the task at hand. After staring at the psych sheet until my vision began to blur, I realized that several things about the list of seeds surprised me in a number of ways.

For starters, many events feature insane depth that give way to steep dropoffs within the top eight seeds. For instance, Eric Shanteau is seeded 6th with a world class 400 IM time of 4:14.33. You can honestly say that anyone of the top six would be a threat to medal in Beijing. Just two spots below Shanteau, the seed times drop steeply to 4:19, a time that will be unlikely to advance beyond the preliminary round in the Olympics. There is a similar pattern in the men's 400 freestyle where the first through fourth seeds all have swum 3:44. The next seed if you except Michael Phelps who will likely not contest the event is then a 3:48

The second thing I noticed was the sheer amount of qualfiers in many events. This is an issue that has really torn me up over the past few weeks, since I read that USA Swimming intended for 800 swimmers to make the meet and ended up with over 1200. On one hand, it seems ridiculous that some events have over one hundred swimmers when the lowest seeded swimmer to qualify for Athens was 17th. The purpose of the meet, after all, is purely to select the athletes who will go to the Olympics. You could then argue that any more than thirty swimmers per event is superfluous. On the other hand, I weigh the value of the experience for over a thousand swimmers who will compete in Omaha and not make the team. For many college age swimmers who don't make the team, this may be a once in a lifetime experience. For younger swimmers, there is a chance to get their feet wet on the big stage before returning in 2012 and claiming their own spots. I concluded in fact that there is a value to many of the additional qualified swimmers, whatever place they are in their career.

After all, trials will be a lasting memory for me as well. For so many years, I have followed the sport from a distance. I only know athletes like Hoff, Phelps and Lochte as times on a page and images on a screen. National level swim meets have taken place in a java live timing window as I, for the most part, imagined what the races looked like. I've been trying to prepare myself for the moment in Omaha when it all becomes real. The best athletes in our sport will not only be right before me in flesh and blood, but their performances will also be more vivid than they have ever been. A little piece of me in petrified of how this meet will take a sledgehammer to the way I've followed swimming. The rest can't wait to take that leap.



Post a Comment

Enter Your Name

or Login Here
Please enter this code to post comment. Login to skip Captcha.
captcha img
#10
Guns' Son.   June 27, 2008 at 7:58pm
In 96 Neil Walker barely made the trials cut and was seeded around 140th in the 100 free. he wound up getting 7th. not making the team probably motivated him even further for the 00 trials. Long-shot performances like this are one of the reasons why they allow so many entries in some events...not to mention adding extra heats to buy some time for the other swimmers.
reply  
#9
Chris DeSantis   June 27, 2008 at 5:11pm
Two things.

Coach M: If you read the entire article you would realize that you are paraphrasing me. We agree that the qualifying standards allow younger swimmers who will be competitive in four years to gain experience.
To all others, Mike and I will be posting our picks by Saturday at midnight on our respective blogs. I have them about 50% complete and I am going to force myself to finish during my plane trip tomorrow.
reply  
#8
Matt Salzberg   June 27, 2008 at 3:06pm
I'm intrigued by what you two are putting together. any chance we can submit our top-8 finishes as well to see how we stack against you guys?
reply  
#7
Matt Smith   June 27, 2008 at 1:18pm
The cuts are actually a little too easy if 1200 people are at the meet. Just means it will be harder to make it next time around. I kind of wonder how many people they had qualified for trials by the end of 2007. And how many people have since qualified with the new suits. Don't forget that FINA amended the breaststroke rules allowing the butterfly kick AFTER the trials standards were set.
reply  
#6
Straub   June 27, 2008 at 10:13am
yeah we would like to see your picks
reply  
#5
Swim Gal   June 27, 2008 at 10:05am
i agree
when do we see your picks? i think we should see your picks now and then after trials you should do a blog with a results comparison!
reply  
#4
Coach M   June 27, 2008 at 6:02am
Chris, I hope you're not implying that the qualifying standards are loose by any means. I understand that some of the qualifiers don't have much of a chance at actually making the team, yet at the same time, it gives those kids a chance to get motivated and come back four years later ready to shine. I know there has been many swimmers who made the Olympic team that were in the bottom 10 in their events the previous quadrennial at the trials meet. As a coach, having trial cuts as challenging as they are but still reachable for top level age groupers is the ideal motivation to reach the next level of being an elite athlete.
reply  
#3
OldSwimmr   June 27, 2008 at 6:00am
Fastest meet in the world!
reply  
#2
Lazy Login'er   June 26, 2008 at 9:15pm
So when can we see your picks!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
reply  
#1
Jimmy Morris   June 26, 2008 at 8:39pm
I can't agree enough about trying to make the "correct" picks. It's flippin impossible. Way harder than trying to pick the NCAA tourney.
reply  

No Tags Yet.


3.4/5 (8 votes cast)

Chris DeSantis is the Assistant Swimming Coach at Georgia Tech. In his spare time, he's trying to learn everything about swimming. Got a complaint, correction or suggestion? Post a comment or send him a message and expect a speedy response!
Archive
 


Official Bloggers
!, The Screaming Viking
Baseheart, Joshua
Brammer, Chris
Brunson, Chris
Coach, Mrs.
DeSantis, Chris
Grace, Jeff
Grose, Darren
Gustafson, Mike
Guthrie, David
Hawke, Brett
McCaffrey, Garrett
McCrary, Christopher
Roberts, Jon
Staley, Trent
Townsend, Darian