Swimming Blogs - Chris DeSantis


« older | newer »

Record Stories

Chris DeSantis | Profile
June 11, 2009

Records are receiving more talk than ever it seems. When I started this blog, I revelled in the chance to discuss a new record in all its glory and talk about the ones that have come before. However, there is one record that has been discussed ad nauseam over the last year that always made me pretty uncomfortable: Alexander Popov's 50 free world record.

I'm definitely not even close to the first person to bring it up. It gets cited over and over again by people who bemoan the effect of suits on world bests. However, before Popov's record stood in rarefied air, it was the subject of much complaint. Here's the best, old grainy video I could find of the swim on youtube:

At first glance, this is pretty awesome. Alex Popov swims a 21.64 in the 50 free swimming in a brief with no cap. I was a huge fan of Popov growing up- I preferred his silent, aloof style to his ever boisterous foil Gary Hall Jr. His stroke was a thing of beauty- something swim coaches talk to each other about in hushed tones. It was entirely contrary to what people expected from a sprinter at that time. Rather than turn it over with everything he had, Popov swam a long, efficient stroke that he had drilled incessantly with his coach Gennadi Touretski.

I started to grow uncomfortable when Hall started running his mouth off about this swim. I was uncomfortable because he was speaking the truth. For one thing, Popov completed this swim without any swimmers in the lane next to him. Anyone in swimming can tell you the advantage, particularly in a sprint, of not having to deal with someone else's wake.

The other accusation made- that Popov had been allowed a rolling start by Russian officials, was much harder to prove. After all, the only people that know for sure that the start was legal are the swimmers and officials at the race. I attempted to break it down like the JFK Zapruder film and discern whether Popov had been granted a false start. Here is what I found:

1. If you freeze the Popov video at 1.3 seconds- which from watching the end of the video we know is in fact synched with the actual running clock in the race- he has completed the following in 1.3 seconds:

a. reacted to the start

b. dove off the blocks

c. spent some time in the air

d. had his entire body enter the water.

2. For comparison's sake, I broke out the higher quality video of Freddy going 20.9:

If you try to match up the Popov position to the 1.3 to where Freddy is at 1.3, Freddy still has some limbs still clearly sticking out of the water, and doesn't go fully submerged until conservatively 1.5-1.6. Now, flight times in the air vary from swimmer to swimmer. However, Popov used a two footed start- which meant more time in the air. Just watch how much longer it takes Popov to get in the water in comparison to his heat at World Championships in 2003:

In that video his entire lower half is still out of the water at 1.3! And he did not have a bad start- he ended up winning the event that day in 48.4

What does it all mean? Not much. Popov was one of the greatest sprint freestylers- perhaps THE greatest of all time. And this record was ratified by FINA- so it must be pretty legit.



Post a Comment

Enter Your Name

or Login Here
Please enter this code to post comment. Login to skip Captcha.
captcha img
#58
Nathan Destree   July 2, 2009 at 10:00pm
great blogg chris but you forget one thing well actually two...first is luck if your lucky in a 50 free final the guy next to you falls in the water when they say take your mark he dq's...empty lane so its kinda unfair to say it wouldnt count cause of the empty lane when one can occur naturally also if your lucky you can count the stater's count (if he has one)...its a big risk but it can work so that rolling start could come naturally....i like this record and i also like the 20.9 i like the suits theres gonna come a time when we platoo and if we have to go to science to break it than so be it and if it comes to that then so be it the fastest swimmer is still going to win...besides if anything i think that suits make the records of yester year that much more impressive like "WOW he did that in a speedo and no cap" like even though pablo doesnt have the world record anymore in the 100 when you say WR 100 fly i think of him and his olympic final i dont care if its not the current WR ad i mean i think for allot of people myself included the suit (maybe not all) but like an fsii its just like a mental turn on "ok its time to go fast and get up 'n race"
reply  
#57
Kevin McGrath   June 29, 2009 at 2:27pm
Interesting analysis. I agree with post #53 though, that you would need data from more of his races in order to have some really conclusive evidence.
reply  
#56
Dave Holmes   June 15, 2009 at 1:41pm
just had a look at the Popov 50m WR video... I see your theory about the 1.3 seconds and being in the water already, but try and pause it when his head is at the 15m mark... it's about 5.4 or 5.5 seconds. That is definitely not a super human effort.
reply  
#55
Shawn Klosterman   June 15, 2009 at 12:29pm
I feel that this blog was very relevant.
AC's are dumb, dumb, dumb... if they had anything to contribute, they would log in.
reply  
#54
Chris DeSantis   June 15, 2009 at 12:23pm
Anonymous Coward said:
This is friggin ridiculous. You're criticizing Popov for something he did years ago??? And you're comparing TWO performances he did??? How much variance is there between performances??? How about you increase your number of Popov races to over 50, then you'll have some conclusive data.

Let's say he did have a rolling start, and he got away with something, and all these other guys are shattering his record, shouldn't that mean something about the BS going on now?
What a dumb blog.
We should be talking about getting rid of the BS that FINA is trying to pull with the suits or providing better drug tests for the guys that pack on 20Kg in less than 9 months.
Dumb, dumb, dumb...I wish I could get back the last 2 minutes of my life...
Tell me how you really feel.
reply  
#53
Anonymous Coward   June 15, 2009 at 12:04pm
This is friggin ridiculous. You're criticizing Popov for something he did years ago??? And you're comparing TWO performances he did??? How much variance is there between performances??? How about you increase your number of Popov races to over 50, then you'll have some conclusive data.

Let's say he did have a rolling start, and he got away with something, and all these other guys are shattering his record, shouldn't that mean something about the BS going on now?
What a dumb blog.
We should be talking about getting rid of the BS that FINA is trying to pull with the suits or providing better drug tests for the guys that pack on 20Kg in less than 9 months.
Dumb, dumb, dumb...I wish I could get back the last 2 minutes of my life...
reply  
#52
Jón Bjarnason   June 14, 2009 at 6:16pm
Chris DeSantis said:
Swimmers come and go, but when do you think the next time we are going to see one man be ranked #1 in the world for 7 consecutive years in the 100 free, like Popov was from 91-97. Do you realize also that Popov retained his #1 world ranking in 97 after suffering major injuries in a stabbing? In 98 he fell to #2, then was #3 for 2 years in a row. In 2001 it looked like he was done, 30 years old and falling all the way to #18. He rebounded to #2 in 2002 and then walked away with both World Championship titles in 2003.
He rebounded after performance-enhancing anabolic steroids, were found in a safe belonging to his coach Gennadi Touretski ;)
This just to make your blog even more "fun" ;o)
reply  
#51
Shug   June 14, 2009 at 5:25pm
well said Chris. Popov is without question the greatest sprinter of all time. There is simpy no comparison given the number of gold medals (world/olympic), world records, and overall titles over his career.

For the record, the silicon caps make a huge difference compared to no cap. I worked in a lab and did tests in a flume and saw HUGE differences (of up to .3 per 50) on silicon vs rubber caps vs no cap...
Would Bousquet beat Popov heads up if they were both in the same suit? Probably, but not by much. But, it still dosen't take away from what Popov did or his legacy in the sport as the greatest sprinter.
reply  
#50
APopov=#1   June 14, 2009 at 11:22am
great blog man! I too feel that popov was the greatest ever. Thing of how fast that guy would have gone in a rocket science or blue seventy, etc.
reply  
#49
Chris DeSantis   June 13, 2009 at 6:33am
getoverit said:
i believe that you cannot really compare sprinters of years past with those of today. It all comes down to body types and advancements in not only suits, but strokes as well. If there is a record out there, people are going to strive to break it and it is unfair to criticize those that do break these records. Im sure ten years down the line we will be talking about some other individual going some ridiculous time and everyone will speculate as to whether this individual is the best there is or if the are extenuating circumstances that account for his greatness. Fred is a beast and just accept that for fact and move on. there will be others who will come up and show us times that are just as fast and even faster than his. Its just the natural progression of sport and life
Swimmers come and go, but when do you think the next time we are going to see one man be ranked #1 in the world for 7 consecutive years in the 100 free, like Popov was from 91-97. Do you realize also that Popov retained his #1 world ranking in 97 after suffering major injuries in a stabbing? In 98 he fell to #2, then was #3 for 2 years in a row. In 2001 it looked like he was done, 30 years old and falling all the way to #18. He rebounded to #2 in 2002 and then walked away with both World Championship titles in 2003.
reply  
#48
Chris DeSantis   June 13, 2009 at 6:24am
NBA FAN said:
I'm going under. And I'm not sure if your serious about the Kobe thing, but he is not one of the top 5 all-time. Top five right now sure, not certainly not all-time. In no particular order:

1. Michael Jordan
2. Magic Johnson
3. Wilt Chamberlain
4. Bill Russell (statistically not otherworldly, but ELEVEN RINGS)
5. Jerry West
6. Larry Bird
7. Hakeem Olajuwon
8. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
9. Shaq
10. Oscar Robertson
All much better players then Kobe. And i could probably come up with another 10
I think Bill Russell would be statistically otherwordly if they had statistics at the time to measure some of his ability. Remember- they didn't count blocks for his entire career and for all accounts this was his number one basketball skill- he was a world class high jumper in college and he would just wait and wait, then spring up and block a shot. There's also no stat for "blocked shots that result in a change of possession", because he was also a master at blocking a shot, then controlling it himself, then lobbing an outlet for a fastbreak point at the other end.

Overall pretty good list. I'm more biased to a few celtics being a boston guy (like Havlicek or Bob Cousy).
reply  
#47
NBA FAN   June 13, 2009 at 12:51am
Bookie said:
I am going to set the over/under on Amazing's age at 17.5 years. Any bets?

And Kobe is one of the top 5 basketball players of all time too - right?
I'm going under. And I'm not sure if your serious about the Kobe thing, but he is not one of the top 5 all-time. Top five right now sure, not certainly not all-time. In no particular order:

1. Michael Jordan
2. Magic Johnson
3. Wilt Chamberlain
4. Bill Russell (statistically not otherworldly, but ELEVEN RINGS)
5. Jerry West
6. Larry Bird
7. Hakeem Olajuwon
8. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
9. Shaq
10. Oscar Robertson
All much better players then Kobe. And i could probably come up with another 10
reply  
#46
Getoverit   June 13, 2009 at 12:37am
i believe that you cannot really compare sprinters of years past with those of today. It all comes down to body types and advancements in not only suits, but strokes as well. If there is a record out there, people are going to strive to break it and it is unfair to criticize those that do break these records. Im sure ten years down the line we will be talking about some other individual going some ridiculous time and everyone will speculate as to whether this individual is the best there is or if the are extenuating circumstances that account for his greatness. Fred is a beast and just accept that for fact and move on. there will be others who will come up and show us times that are just as fast and even faster than his. Its just the natural progression of sport and life
reply  
#45
Chris DeSantis   June 12, 2009 at 7:33pm
Popov's resume:

The only person to win both sprint golds in the modern (Post WW 2) era in back to back Olympics. Held the WR in the 100 free for around 8 years. Similarly held the world record shown here in the 50 for about 8 years. He was basically in the conversation for world's best sprinter from 1991-2004, an incredibly long period of time to be around the top in any event.
reply  
#44
Bookie   June 12, 2009 at 3:44pm
I am going to set the over/under on Amazing's age at 17.5 years. Any bets?

And Kobe is one of the top 5 basketball players of all time too - right?
reply  
#43
3.141592653...   June 12, 2009 at 3:15pm
I was at the World Championships in Barcelona in 2003... was quite surprised to see A. Popov with an Arena (leg suit - to the ankle) the first time he ever used an advanced suit than his usual brief suit that he wore since his legendary career started in the Barcelona, 92' Olympic Games...
reply  
#42
Amazing   June 12, 2009 at 2:48pm
Freddy can go 21.6 in a brief EASY! He can cruise a 21.6 Popov is not even close to the best sprinter of all time
reply  
#41
Jeff Grace   June 12, 2009 at 12:19pm
Chris DeSantis said:
His kick definitely had smaller amplitude than others. There's really no advantage to making a big splash, he just maintains really good contact with the water so that his feet are always doing something to propel him.
This is an interesting point - I will need to watch more full speed Popov swimming in the next few days.

I have watch Popov training video extensively and if you watch his kick underwater his knee bend is huge.
reply  
#40
Chris DeSantis   June 12, 2009 at 12:12pm
technique said:
is it just me or does it seem in the 21.64 video that Popov's kick was less big that others? It seems that he had smaller, faster kicks than huge, powerful ones.
His kick definitely had smaller amplitude than others. There's really no advantage to making a big splash, he just maintains really good contact with the water so that his feet are always doing something to propel him.
reply  
#39
Jeff Grace   June 12, 2009 at 12:08pm
Anonymous Coward said:
As good as Popov was - and he was superlatively good - I've always thought his 21.64 was a bit suspect...
The 50 free, though, that has been lost in all of this discussion was/is Tom Jager's 21.81!! What a rockin' time!! Holy cow, that was fast! And done back in, what, 1987?! Nobody was under 22.2 and he & Biondi took the 50 down to 21.81. Unreal swim.
I don't necessarily agree with your assertions on Popov - but I do agree with you on the Jager swim.

One thing that is not mentioned here with Jager though - which has been mentioned as an advantage to Popov - is that Jager broke that record with only him and Biondi in the pool. Now that is one persons wake to deal with - but with only two people in the pool it is definitely an advantage.

This record was broken in a made for TV event - which was a great idea and happened in 87 - Dash for Cash - name could be wrong - it was a round robbin of head to head swims with two swimmers in the pool - the final match up was the one everyone wanted to see what was the greatest rivalry in sprint swimming - Jager v Biondi.
reply  
#38
Technique   June 12, 2009 at 10:54am
is it just me or does it seem in the 21.64 video that Popov's kick was less big that others? It seems that he had smaller, faster kicks than huge, powerful ones.
reply  
#37
Jonathan   June 12, 2009 at 10:48am
I dun deny. Popov is the greatest sprinter of all time. I would really love to see everyone in today's sprinting fraternity sprinting in just trunks. or maybe see Popov sprint in a LZR racer.
reply  
#36
Chris DeSantis   June 12, 2009 at 10:47am
Its just for fun Tallswimmer.
reply  
#35
Tallswimmer   June 12, 2009 at 10:30am
There was obviously a shooter on the grassy knoll!

This is ridiculous, making assertions based upon some shoddy youtube videos? Come on!
reply  
#34
Tristan Vowles   June 12, 2009 at 9:43am
Matt Strmec said:
I think Peter is right, if you watch the clock in the first video, there is a delay between the flash and when the clock starts moving. The swimmers are already moving as the clock gets to .1-.2 and it is impossible that they can react that fast.
Just noticed that myself. The swimmers' hands have already left the block when the scoreboard clock says 0.1s, which is impossible since it takes between 0.1 and 0.2 seconds for the brain just to register the start.
reply  
#33
Tristan Vowles   June 12, 2009 at 9:37am
Peter_Galick said:
For anyone who still questions Freddy look at that WR video. I see a few other Jakeds and I only see one 20.9.

Oh and he also beat the Olympic Champion who also happens to be his training partner, Cesar, on the second Mare Norstrum stop in 21.6 while wearing a "plain old" LZR.
Freddy's good. Freddy is a much better swimmer than a hell of a lot of people over 50/100 free, and that's why he's the only one going 20.9 in a jaked.. those people he beat were slower than him anyway. The point is that his best without jaked is 0.7seconds slower than that, which, in training or not, is a lot of time to be adding over 50m.

If Freddy does not go 21.1 or faster in rome, I will be forced to believe that the suit made the difference. anything more than 0.2 above your best in a 50 while tapered, barring illness or injury, is inexplicable.
reply  
#32
Matt Strmec   June 12, 2009 at 9:25am
I think Peter is right, if you watch the clock in the first video, there is a delay between the flash and when the clock starts moving. The swimmers are already moving as the clock gets to .1-.2 and it is impossible that they can react that fast.
reply  
#31
Rob Robson   June 12, 2009 at 9:22am
So, what's a sprinter, when determining the best? 50m, 100m or both?

Track athletes would scoff at the idea of a 47 second race being a sprint. I know that the higher impact of running contributes to this, but at the elite and there's a considerable physiological difference between a 50 and 100m, as well as overall speed.
Popov was great over 50m and 100m but Jager was a 50 man, wasn't he? I know Biondi won Olympic gold over 100m too. The 100m has always been the 'blue riband' event, but not necessarily the best sprinter...
reply  
#30
Adam Depmore   June 12, 2009 at 8:42am
Suits keep the sport alive, keep the money coming in, extend athletes careers, and get the nasty out of everybody.
reply  
#29
Peter   June 12, 2009 at 8:42am
After looking at the start from the 21.64 video, I gotta tell you, it doesn't seem like he is rolling ahead of his competitors - nor enters the water significantly before them. If anything I wonder if they timing system was delayed, and not necessarily running off the starter. I've seen meets run where someone manually hits that start button on the CTS when they hear the beep as there is a malfunction with that connection.
reply  
#28
Anonymous Coward   June 12, 2009 at 12:02am
Peter_Galick said:
For anyone who still questions Freddy look at that WR video. I see a few other Jakeds and I only see one 20.9.

Oh and he also beat the Olympic Champion who also happens to be his training partner, Cesar, on the second Mare Norstrum stop in 21.6 while wearing a "plain old" LZR.
By "beating" Cesar, you mean he touching him out by .01... sure, a win is a win, but you sort of make it sound like Bousquet smoke Cielo. Oh and 20.9 to 21.6 is still a 0.7 difference. pretty big
reply  
#27
Anonymous Coward   June 11, 2009 at 11:57pm
you guys are all a bunch of swimming nerdsss
who gives a crap about suits.
im a college swimmer and I dont give a darn about who wears what suit and the times they go.
grow up everyone.
comparing new swimmers to old swimmers is comparing apples to oranges
reply  
#26
Andre DeNegri   June 11, 2009 at 11:48pm
I can not really tell, but does Popov breath every other or not at all?
reply  
#25
Peter_Galick   June 11, 2009 at 9:40pm
For anyone who still questions Freddy look at that WR video. I see a few other Jakeds and I only see one 20.9.

Oh and he also beat the Olympic Champion who also happens to be his training partner, Cesar, on the second Mare Norstrum stop in 21.6 while wearing a "plain old" LZR.
reply  
#24
Chris DeSantis   June 11, 2009 at 8:26pm
Thats a little bit unfair considering Freddy just got down there a month ago. I think we'll see him swim very close to that time again later this summer.

By the way I still think Popov was the greatest sprinter of all time.
reply  
#23
Tristan Vowles   June 11, 2009 at 7:24pm
Chris DeSantis said:
Also might note that Popov never came even close to repeating this swim. He was 21.9 earlier in the same meet in real competition. Did not break 22 at the Olympics later that year. He repeated his 21.9 a couple times. Compare to other WR holders in the event who had a number of performances within .10 of their own WR.
compare to, say... Bousquet? He has been under 21.5 a total of 1 time. He has been under 21.0 a total of.. wait for it... 1 time.
reply  
#22
Tristan Vowles   June 11, 2009 at 7:22pm
compare to, say.. Bousquet? He has been under 21.5 a total of 1 time. He has also been under 21.0 a total of.. wait for it... 1 time.
reply  
#21
Tristan Vowles   June 11, 2009 at 7:18pm
Anonymous Coward said:
A correction to my last post: Jager went 21.81 in 1990. Still a hell of a swim and it stood for 10 years before Popov broke it in a time trial.
agreed. popov had that AMAZING one off swim, but i think the best sprinter of all time would arguably have to be jager.

and to chris: i have just watched a number of popovs other races and i agree that he consistently enters last. however, when he set the world record, if he had had a rolling start, wouldn't he have been ahead of his other competitors (who were also using the slower two-footed start)? It looks to me as though everybody enters pretty much evenly in that race.
reply  
#20
Anonymous Coward   June 11, 2009 at 5:04pm
A correction to my last post: Jager went 21.81 in 1990. Still a hell of a swim and it stood for 10 years before Popov broke it in a time trial.
reply  
#19
Anonymous Coward   June 11, 2009 at 4:56pm
As good as Popov was - and he was superlatively good - I've always thought his 21.64 was a bit suspect...
The 50 free, though, that has been lost in all of this discussion was/is Tom Jager's 21.81!! What a rockin' time!! Holy cow, that was fast! And done back in, what, 1987?! Nobody was under 22.2 and he & Biondi took the 50 down to 21.81. Unreal swim.
reply  
#18
Darren Grose   June 11, 2009 at 3:17pm
Chris DeSantis said:
Darren,

I've heard unconfirmed reports that he did that he did that swim with a propeller attached fueled by Craig Lord's hot air. If that is true then I think his times are seriously in question.
Also I am launching a full investigation into David Berkoff. I've heard rumors that he took classes at Harvard that gave him an unfair advantage.
I thought Berkoff's Harvard advantage was one of those dirty little secrets everyone was afraid to talk about. I'm glad you have the courage to step up and get to the bottom of this.
reply  
#17
Chris DeSantis   June 11, 2009 at 3:17pm
Also might note that Popov never came even close to repeating this swim. He was 21.9 earlier in the same meet in real competition. Did not break 22 at the Olympics later that year. He repeated his 21.9 a couple times. Compare to other WR holders in the event who had a number of performances within .10 of their own WR.
reply  
#16
Chris DeSantis   June 11, 2009 at 3:07pm
Here's Popov's other race at Barcelona 2003: Still One of the last to enter the water, clearly entering well after 1.3, and emerging with the victory:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjWZzWExGmU&feature=related
reply  
#15
Chris DeSantis   June 11, 2009 at 3:03pm
Yes, because as I explained, Popov was one of the few international sprinters of his generation to still use a track start. Clearly this was a predominant technique in Russia, because most if not all of the swimmers in his heat in the first video are executing two footed starts. A two footed start gives you more time in the air with poorer reaction time. You sacrifice power for speed. If you've watched Popov race you know that he consistently enters the water last.
reply  
#14
Tristan Vowles   June 11, 2009 at 2:56pm
also, personally, looking at the videos above, i do not see any difference between popovs 21.64 at 1.3 seconds and bousquets race at 1.3. As for the third video, it could have been that popov had had a bad start. lets not forget that his best was 48.12, so even though he won the event, it wasn't his best race. in fact, pausing the third video at 1.3 i think clearly shows everybody else already almost completely submerged.
reply  
#13
Chris DeSantis   June 11, 2009 at 2:56pm
Darren Grose said:
Freddy popped a 21.5 last summer at one of the southern sectional meets.
Darren,

I've heard unconfirmed reports that he did that he did that swim with a propeller attached fueled by Craig Lord's hot air. If that is true then I think his times are seriously in question.
Also I am launching a full investigation into David Berkoff. I've heard rumors that he took classes at Harvard that gave him an unfair advantage.
reply  
#12
Darren Grose   June 11, 2009 at 2:52pm
Tristan Vowles said:
briefs and no cap make a HELL of a difference.
bousquet's best in a presently approved suit (one that is clearly better than a brief), WITH a cap on, is still slower (albeit by 0.01) than popov's best, and 0.37 behind sullivan, although bousquet has not raced fully rested since his 20.94 jaked assisted swim at french nats. i guess we will have to wait for rome to see where he stands.
Freddy popped a 21.5 last summer at one of the southern sectional meets.
reply  
#11
Ben Skutnik   June 11, 2009 at 2:47pm
If we are going to talk about the suit and cap difference, lets also talk about the difference in the quality of testing for banned substances. Back then I would have to believe that it wasn't as thorough as it is today.
reply  
#10
Blastoff   June 11, 2009 at 2:46pm
You guys are falling into the CL trap--comparing sprinters from different generations. It's impossible to do and doing so gives the anti-suit crowd more ammunition. Freddie, Eamon, Alain, and all the other new generation guys are very fast and very qualified to be placed along side Popov. Please stop the comparison. . . unless you want to talk about how I would have gone 50.5 100 back with the new suit, a silicon cap, and unlimited underwaters...

Peace.
reply  
#9
Tristan Vowles   June 11, 2009 at 2:36pm
briefs and no cap make a HELL of a difference.
bousquet's best in a presently approved suit (one that is clearly better than a brief), WITH a cap on, is still slower (albeit by 0.01) than popov's best, and 0.37 behind sullivan, although bousquet has not raced fully rested since his 20.94 jaked assisted swim at french nats. i guess we will have to wait for rome to see where he stands.
reply  
#8
Kirk Nelson   June 11, 2009 at 2:11pm
If it was anything other than a 50 meter long course I'd say clear water next to you would definitely help, but without turns I really don't think it would make much difference.
reply  
#7
Chris DeSantis   June 11, 2009 at 2:04pm
It would definitely help the swimmer thats behind. The question is whether it helps the swimmer who is in the lead, and I believe it does.

I'll try to explain it in a different way. The advantage of not having someone swimming next to you is clean undisturbed water. While its true that Popov would have led the entire way and would have had the cleanest water in from of him, the wake from swimmers occupying the lanes next to him still would have disturbed the water around his torso and legs. Not a huge deal- but the NCAA for instance will not allow someone to qualify for NCAAs in a competition with lanes between swimmers partly for this reason.
reply  
#6
Kirk Nelson   June 11, 2009 at 1:57pm
Remember when Trickett swam the really fast relay leadoff at the Duel in the Pool against Phelps? In that case people argued that Trickett got an advantage from Phelps' wake, so what's it going to be? Is the wake going to help you or hurt you? I would actually argue that the draft effect can help the trailing swimmer, but I don't think the lead swimmer really gets an advantage or disadvantage.
reply  
#5
Chris DeSantis   June 11, 2009 at 1:52pm
Look at this way- in order to be wholly unaffected by the wake produced by a swimmer next to you, you would need to have your entire body length ahead of any part of their stroke. Popov is very tall: nearly 2 meters. You might be able to argue that he would be two meters ahead of his competition if the competition was fairly poo, and even then it would be for the last few strokes.
reply  
#4
Chris DeSantis   June 11, 2009 at 1:35pm
Thats a very good point. Although- there is still an effect of someone swimming next to you in a lane, even if you are ahead of them.
reply  
#3
Kirk Nelson   June 11, 2009 at 1:34pm
"Anyone in swimming can tell you the advantage, particularly in a sprint, of not having to deal with someone else's wake."

What wake? Popov would have been ahead of everyone and their wakes wouldn't have affected him.
reply  
#2
Anonymous Coward   June 11, 2009 at 1:12pm
Popov is the man
reply  
#1
Love It!   June 11, 2009 at 12:23pm
Interesting! Thanks for pointing that out!
reply  

No Tags Yet.


5.0/5 (10 votes cast)

Archive
 


Official Bloggers
Baseheart, Joshua
Brammer, Chris
Brunson, Chris
Coach, Mrs.
From Flotrack, Mark
Grace, Jeff
Grose, Darren
Gustafson, Mike
Guthrie, David
Hawke, Brett
McCrary, Christopher
Roberts, Jon
Staley, Trent
Townsend, Darian