Men's NCAA Day 1 Prelim


#1
   March 26, 2009 at 12:37pm
Day 1 prelims, where we get our first feel of how teams are swimming. 200 Free Relay, 500 Free, 200 IM, and 50 Free... Let's talk about it.

For interviews from day 1 prelims go to: http://www.floswimming.org/videos/coverage/view_video/234819-mens-division-i-ncaa-championships/164652-meet-the-meet-mens-ncaas

Quick and Dirty Day 1 Halftime Show
Get the Flash Player to see this player.

reply  

Enter Your Name

or Login Here
Please enter this code to post comment. Login to skip Captcha.
captcha img

#80
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 7:53pm
\ said:
you are such a tool. why don't you just wait and watch
guess i'd rather be a tool and right than WRONG!
reply  
#79
\   March 26, 2009 at 7:26pm
you are such a tool. why don't you just wait and watch
reply  
#78
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 7:15pm
graham said:
alex righi is going to beat nathan adrian. no question
please stop smoking and posting
reply  
#77
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 7:03pm
Alright guys. Now that the finals have begun lets move over to a new topic to talk about it:

http://www.floswimming.org/topics/view/158-day-1-final
reply  
#76
Graham   March 26, 2009 at 7:02pm
alex righi is going to beat nathan adrian. no question
reply  
#75
ACLU   March 26, 2009 at 6:56pm
double lane lines for men, single for women...a bit of gender discrimination i believe.
reply  
#74
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 6:55pm
ITS LIVE!
reply  
#73
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 6:39pm
I like Ryan Roberts' picks. That 500 will be so fun to watch. Who goes out too fast? Who tries to go with them? Who keeps it together? Because it seems there is no PVK in the race. I think the safe money is on Kleuh, but so much can happen. Look out for Worsely. I say he is top 3. DeSantis - c'mon, there can't be any way 18.7 wins - can there? I say more like 18.4, and Im rooting for Righi, but he can't go 18.4
reply  
#72
Swimfan   March 26, 2009 at 6:32pm
haha..dont sell yourself short
reply  
#71
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 6:27pm
We didn't make any predictions. I'm pretty sure if I did they wouldn't be too much better than 50%
reply  
#70
Swimfan   March 26, 2009 at 6:15pm
Just curious Chris..what was your percentage last year for predictions..you too Garrett..Were you guys above 50% or below and who was higher?
reply  
#69
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 5:53pm
50 Free - no and no chris - faster than 18.7 and not Righi - Targett 18.63, Adrian 2nd, Righi 3rd
200 Relay - Auburn, Cal, Stanford
500 Free - UVA kid, 4:10ish
400 MR - Cal
IM - don't know, don't care
reply  
#68
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 5:45pm
Those were definitely the two I was least confident in.

Still, they're better than your picks.
reply  
#67
Sorry Chris   March 26, 2009 at 5:44pm
500 will be under 410 and 200 im will not be won by bradley ally
reply  
#66
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 5:39pm
I am already on record predicting Auburn as my "lock" for the 200 free relay and saying that they will definitely break the NCAA record. I think Stanford may be under that record as well.
500 free I see Basson emerging victorious. 4:10.4
Ally looks good in the 200 IM. 1:41.4
50 Free I think Righi in 18.7
400 Medley Relay Cal 3:02.5
reply  
#65
Ryan Roberts   March 26, 2009 at 5:25pm
predictions:
2 free relay - Auburn 1:14.3
500 Free - Kleuh 4:09.5
200 IM - Ally 1:40.6
50 Free - Targett 18.4
400 MR - Cal 3:01.9

Chris and Garrett, can we hear yours?
reply  
#64
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 3:52pm
Chris DeSantis said:
You know, the funniest thing is that Yale was ABSOLUTELY dominant in the 1950s up to the 1960s. They are one of just a handful of schools to have won multiple NCAA titles.

But yeah, it has been a long time since the 1960s.
LOL I know!
reply  
#63
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 3:47pm
You know, the funniest thing is that Yale was ABSOLUTELY dominant in the 1950s up to the 1960s. They are one of just a handful of schools to have won multiple NCAA titles.

But yeah, it has been a long time since the 1960s.
reply  
#62
Nick Montes De Oca   March 26, 2009 at 3:47pm
watch out for ricky berens' closing speed in the IM tonight
reply  
#61
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 3:45pm
I can't wait for the 50 tonight...I saw Righi swim at Ivies, and that kid is unbelievable...It would be amazing to see a guy like him (or anyone for the matter) to win an event at NCAA's coming from a school that isn't notorious for having an awesome swim program (ie Auburn, Stanford, Texas, etc.)

So I guess at 7 we all go online to http://all-access.cbssports.com/player.html?code=ncaa&media=109275 to watch...I can't wait!
reply  
#60
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 3:45pm
Check back to the site for interviews though and we will have a topic like this for every session of the meet so you can interact. Our coverage page for NCAAs is here:

http://www.floswimming.org/videos/coverage/view/234819-mens-division-i-ncaa-championships
reply  
#59
Nick Montes De Oca   March 26, 2009 at 3:43pm
thats too bad...can't match the floswimming commentary!
reply  
#58
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 3:42pm
Nick Montes De Oca said:
any way we can watch finals tonight?...will floswimming have race coverage?
Sorry to say we cannot broadcast races from this meet.

CBS Sports should have a live feed, they did this morning.
http://all-access.cbssports.com/player.html?code=ncaa&media=109275
I believe, to answer an earlier question, that finals will begin at 7pm Central time.
reply  
#57
Coville   March 26, 2009 at 3:39pm
Don't forget Alex Coville for the 50. He looked really good this morning on both the relay and in the 50.
reply  
#56
Nick Montes De Oca   March 26, 2009 at 3:38pm
any way we can watch finals tonight?...will floswimming have race coverage?
reply  
#55
Larry Dow   March 26, 2009 at 3:36pm
when does the finals session start?
reply  
#54
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 3:35pm
Another option for Cal is to use Graeme Moore if they think he can go fast enough in fly for them to use Adrian as their freestyler.
reply  
#53
Garrett McCaffrey   March 26, 2009 at 3:34pm
yeah at the 200 Cal was over a second in front of the Stanford split which set a new NCAA record... Will Adrian be on that relay swimming fly for Cal tonight? Which relay would he not swim then?
reply  
#52
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 3:29pm
50.3 split from the Cal breaststroker in the relay. that's ridiculous
reply  
#51
Swim26   March 26, 2009 at 3:24pm
Wollach's Back Lead-off is a huge drop....44.9! Wonder if he can go faster than that
reply  
#50
TSandoval   March 26, 2009 at 3:24pm
Tyler Clary is going to win both IMs and the 2 back
reply  
#49
Uvafan   March 26, 2009 at 3:17pm
Was everyone in prelims wearing tech suits? I thought a saw some fspros in the 500 prelims but wasnt sure.
reply  
#48
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 3:17pm
Anonymous Coward said:
Walters in the 50 ....was it a mistake?
duh.. he got tossed around like a rag doll
reply  
#47
rileyka9   March 26, 2009 at 3:16pm
Anonymous Coward said:
50.3 breastroke split with a +.29 relay start. We are getting awfully close to the 49. That would be the craziest thing that could happen at this meet. No one's got a 39 free split in them - do they?
i dunno targett went a 18.1 with a relay start at SECs untapered (but he was shaved). i think if he is anchoring the 400 free relay and it is close it is a definite possibility that he could break 40.

just imagine if cielo had come back this year. adrian, targett, cielo, righi.... crazy
reply  
#46
Lucifer   March 26, 2009 at 3:14pm
thanks
reply  
#45
Jesus Christ   March 26, 2009 at 3:14pm
yeah, 43.93 is fast as sh*********T but hes been 44 already, flat start
reply  
#44
Jesus Christ   March 26, 2009 at 3:13pm
Scroll down, there is a link to the results...
reply  
#43
Swimfan   March 26, 2009 at 3:11pm
I thought mclean looked tired and seemed to have a hard time holding off Jackson. I think tonight it will be a 3 man race, Basson, Prinsloo and Klueh..I am ver curious at to what Patton does tonight...can not beleive what it took to come back in everything tonight
reply  
#42
Staab   March 26, 2009 at 3:11pm
Staab's 43.93 on the Medley Relay was quite impressive.
reply  
#41
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 3:10pm
Are the results posted for prelims anywhere?
reply  
#40
Mars Blackmon   March 26, 2009 at 3:03pm
Chris DeSantis said:
I would say a combination of both. Suits play a factor but don't think that NCAA swimming on the whole hasn't improved as well.
is it the suits? is it the suits? is it the suits? ...money, it's gotta be the suits.
reply  
#39
Im Predicting   March 26, 2009 at 3:01pm
200 IM ncaa record is going down, if there is an epic battle between berens, clary and ally
reply  
#38
Hahahaha   March 26, 2009 at 2:58pm
Mahoney at 28.8 on the breast split... 25.5, 28.8, 28.8, 28.8 = 151.9
reply  
#37
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 2:57pm
Worsely - 2:06.9 - 2:06.9. Some crazy splitting for such a fast swim. He may have something left in him. Just like last year, look at him at the 300 yard mark.
reply  
#36
Quick...   March 26, 2009 at 2:55pm
Clary at 24.8 on the back split
reply  
#35
North Bmo   March 26, 2009 at 2:50pm
Wow! The 500 free is anyone's game tonight. Was Mclean conserving energy for finals or did he simply get tired? Either way, an awesome last heat nonetheless. Prinsloo really pulled away after that 250 mark.
reply  
#34
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 2:48pm
#33
Andrew Birnbrich   March 26, 2009 at 2:47pm
Is it just me, or are the results not up yet?
reply  
#32
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 2:41pm
I still have a problem with the selection of these swimmers. Too many relays favor the bigger programs, sans Yale and UCD mentioned below. I see people swimming here that got B cuts, but didn't qualify except for their participation on a relay. To swim an individual event you should make the cut, dont you all agree?
reply  
#31
DU Alum   March 26, 2009 at 2:39pm
Way to go Worsley in the 500! He's a competitor and will drop more time in finals.... Should be an interesting race
reply  
#30
Kris Olszewski   March 26, 2009 at 2:34pm
I can say only one thing "new era"... 47 guys below 20 sec in 50, 19.09 to make consol, 5 guys below 19sec... or 1:43 to make top 8 in 200im... I love this sport and NCAA is the badass meet
reply  
#29
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 2:33pm
I would say a combination of both. Suits play a factor but don't think that NCAA swimming on the whole hasn't improved as well.
reply  
#28
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 2:31pm
Garrett McCaffrey said:
Bradley Ally top qualifier in the 200 IM (1:41.8). Only other swimmers under 1:42: Clary and Berens. It took a 1:44.3 to get a night swim, 1:43.5 for finals....
1:43 to make finals? WOW - what a difference a year makes. Last year you could make top 8 with 1:46. Is that because of suits or all the better guys weren't swimming in preparation for trials?
reply  
#27
John   March 26, 2009 at 2:22pm
The 500 free looks as if any one of the top guys could take the win! I guess its all going to depend on who has the guts to take it out faster and hold on...no doubt a great race to watch!!!
reply  
#26
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 2:07pm
50.3 breastroke split with a +.29 relay start. We are getting awfully close to the 49. That would be the craziest thing that could happen at this meet. No one's got a 39 free split in them - do they?
reply  
#25
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 2:04pm
Chris DeSantis said:
Alex Righi is the lurking third variable in what many thought would be a Targett-Adrian dual. Righi tied the American Record to top qualifying in 18.82
AR (tie) for AR won't matter this evening, he will be back to third, NA owns him after swim off at trials
reply  
#24
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 2:01pm
#23
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 1:59pm
the official site doesn't have results up yet...what is wrong with you people in texas?
reply  
#22
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 1:54pm
Chris DeSantis said:
Lets wait until after finals.
ok, I'll wait ...but If he goes 4:10 / :11 even if it doesn't win I'm betting on Troy for the 1650
reply  
#21
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 1:49pm
Anonymous Coward said:
Prinsloo, looked awfully damn easy to me. Even if he doesn't win the 500, Is he a lock ( I know no true such thing) for the 1650 ? LaTourette lurking ?
Lets wait until after finals.
reply  
#20
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 1:49pm
I don't think so. He would have needed a 4:14 to make top 8 in the 500 and consols was no guarantee.
reply  
#19
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 1:48pm
Prinsloo, looked awfully damn easy to me. Even if he doesn't win the 500, Is he a lock ( I know no true such thing) for the 1650 ? LaTourette lurking ?
reply  
#18
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 1:46pm
Walters in the 50 ....was it a mistake?
reply  
#17
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 1:44pm
Do you count Princeton? They made top 16 in the 200 freestyle relay.

And yes I remember the talk about Righi. Also there was some controversy over him being named National High School Swimmer of the year by Swimming World. Accusations were of Arizona bias, and that either Michael Klueh or Bradley Alley deserved the award. Alley seemed like the best high school swimmer to me, but Klueh performed the best early on his college career. Now Righi may be at the top of the heap.
reply  
#16
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 1:43pm
Remember when Righi graduated High School? Guys on message boards railed that he went to Yale instead of one of the traditional powers. I guess Yale is working out for him. His body looks like he's got some growing into it still. He is the American Record holder - and I think he was just more than a swim-off with Adrian away from making that USA 400 free relay team last summer. Oh yeah - he'll have a Yale degree. Nice job Yale - Tim and Frank. What small schools do we have swimming tonight? Yale, Denver in finals - UC Davis in consis...
reply  
#15
Newswim   March 26, 2009 at 1:36pm
Congratulations to Righi for getting a piece of the American Record this morning!
reply  
#14
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 1:35pm
Alex Righi is the lurking third variable in what many thought would be a Targett-Adrian dual. Righi tied the American Record to top qualifying in 18.82
reply  
#13
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 1:30pm
With all the talk of who was or wasn't tapered for their conference meet, I guess i kinda expected more people under 19. Nevertheless - 19.09 to make final 8 is nuts. So what teams have bigger horses to throw into the 200 Free relay finals tonight? Gotta think Morrell can go faster for Tenn, but who trades in a 19.8 for an 18.8? Garrret - I would love to see you talk to the Denver coach - He's Texas grad.
reply  
#12
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 1:24pm
They definitely transition their momentum from the first 25 into the second 25 very well.
reply  
#11
Anonymous Coward   March 26, 2009 at 1:23pm
Worsely is a horse. I remember him closing from lane 1 or 8 last year in the 500 Consi's heat. What is it about the Auburn Sprinters that allows them to look like they neg split the 50. They all finish so amazingly strong.
reply  
#10
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 1:16pm
Clary looked really fired up with his swim. Huge swim for Shaune Fraser of Florida to make the top 8 with a 1:42.4
reply  
#9
Garrett McCaffrey   March 26, 2009 at 1:14pm
Bradley Ally top qualifier in the 200 IM (1:41.8). Only other swimmers under 1:42: Clary and Berens. It took a 1:44.3 to get a night swim, 1:43.5 for finals....
reply  
#8
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 12:59pm
Huge for Texas to put 2 into the top 8 in the 5. Stanford has three swimming at night in this event but would love to have at least one in the top 8.
reply  
#7
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 12:57pm
500 free it looks like Bollier went out like a mad dog and died pretty hard. He just missed top 8 and is in 9th. All the top heat guys closed really well when they needed too, particularly Kleuh, Prinsloo and McLean.
reply  
#6
Garrett McCaffrey   March 26, 2009 at 12:56pm
Troy Prinsloo found another gear somewhere around the 250... He's your top qualifier going in at 4:12:49, Klueh is second with a 4:13.66 and he showed some great closing speed... Looking at the Team race: Stanford didn't get a guy in the finals... Bollier was out in 1:38 but finished with a 4:14.75 (9th)
reply  
#5
Garrett McCaffrey   March 26, 2009 at 12:40pm
fastest split on the 200 Free relay was Jordan Smith of Arizona 18.5... Adrian's leadoff was 19.09
reply  
#4
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 12:40pm
Hey whoever called Blake Worsley of Denver as an upset special in the 200 free must be kinda happy with himself right now. 4:13.8 a very impressive time and really made Basson work in prelims.
reply  
#3
Garrett McCaffrey   March 26, 2009 at 12:39pm
Stanford looked good too. 3 18s and a 19.0... Side note that was an American record for Texas (1:16:22) and it only tied them for 5th...
reply  
#2
Chris DeSantis   March 26, 2009 at 12:37pm
Auburn still looks like a lock to me in that 200 free relay. They are top seed without using Targett and could add Krug depending on how he swims in the 50 this morning.
reply