BlueSeventy's Response to FINA's Ruling : Speakers & Interviews
|
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
|
Steve NichollsBlueSeventy's Response to FINA's RulingMay 19, 2009 This is blueSeventy's CEO Steve Nicholls and his initial response to the ruling laid out by FINA Today.
About Steve Nicholls
Rate this Video
Tags:
Coverages Steve Nicholls is part of (1):Flocasts (1)
|



its not that everyone is that mad the blueseventy was banned. its that the lzr wasn't banned with it. and they let it last so long if they were going to ban it, they shouldve banned it when it first came out and not waited for everyone to buy them
Oh will everyone stop crying about the swim suits, and just get back to swimming. What do you want next ... to be allowed to put an outboard motor on the back of suits and think that its the talent of the swimmer. Which part does everyone not understand? The rules say "no devices that create buoyancy" ... the suits create additional buoyancy ... that's the facts. Get over it, and just start swimming.
so i bought a nero comp for my high school state meet in February...am i allowed to wear it anymore at USA meets? Someone please answer this?
the whole issue with suits is that not everyone feels the benefits of them in equal measure. its a naive attitude to say that they dont make a difference, ive seen, firsthand, the differences some suits can make. ive watched swimmers who arent doing anything new or different in their training, and yet theyre taking chunks off theyre times. a suit might not make a bad swimmer good but its certainly going to make him look a lot better.
Hate to break it to you there sport - but it WAS the sport.
But keep your nose to the grindstone and your head in the sand.
I got a LZR for free by mistake at SC Nats in Atlanta in December. I've worn it once. I dropped 2 seconds in my 2free. That was not from the suit. It was from busting my ass twice a day for 6 months. You guys need to stop blaming fast swimming on suits and stop using it to rationalize why you aren't good enough. They might help, but they don't make a mediocre swimmer great, or a bad swimmer good. How talented you are, and more importantly, how much pain your willing to put yourself through, determines that. I won't be wearing a LZR again, because I don't need it. Maybe some of you should do the same. Peace
Hate to break it to you there sport - but it WAS the sport.
But keep your nose to the grindstone and your head in the sand.
I got a LZR for free by mistake at SC Nats in Atlanta in December. I've worn it once. I dropped 2 seconds in my 2free. That was not from the suit. It was from busting my ass twice a day for 6 months. You guys need to stop blaming fast swimming on suits and stop using it to rationalize why you aren't good enough. They might help, but they don't make a mediocre swimmer great, or a bad swimmer good. How talented you are, and more importantly, how much pain your willing to put yourself through, determines that. I won't be wearing a LZR again, because I don't need it. Maybe some of you should do the same. Peace
But keep your nose to the grindstone and your head in the sand.
The B70 is not buoyant, it just feels like it because it is very efficient in reducing drag. Since when has drag reduction been outside of the rules? That's exactly what each successive generation of suits has always done. The air-trapping claim is dubious. The first B70 I ever wore was too big and water sloshed around inside the suit. Definitely not a comfortable feeling and hardly advantageous. How about developing a perforated non-permeable material that would be durable, affordable, fast, and incapable of trapping air?
We tell swimmers to swim in their suit before they get up to race so the suit sticks to the body and does not allow water into the suit upon entry. If air gets into the suit and "trapped" certainly water will do the same things (this is not preferred by swimmers).
The lesson we should be teaching our athletes and children alike is that if someone beats you in a race, performance, business, etc. you need to find another way to regain your championship form. Work harder, develop a new technology, recommit yourself to excellence. What ever you do, do not pay or strong arm an international organization to cut the feet out from under every single brand that is kicking your butt in the pool.
It is difficult to have any respect or willingness to follow such a corrupt organization.
Going back to swimming in briefs will set the sport back 40 years. People love to swim fast and see fast swimming. If the suits to do not float, don't fix it. Society loves to see a golfer drive the ball 20 yards further or watch a baseball player hit more home runs. Technology is part of our every day life and it has put swimming in a better position than it has ever been. Most coaches on the deck use cell phones and lap tops, but some want us to swim in products from 40 years ago. Really?
Maintain integrity in the sport, allow technology and for the love of the sport, put people in charge that care about the future and development of the sport we love more than shoving cash in their own pockets. If they were truly great at what they did you wouldn't need to be paid off.
We are allowing track start inserts on starting blocks but we cannot swim in a blueseventy or a jaked suit. Let me guess, the manufacturers of these block sponsor FINA.
Make rules that promote the sport, allow for technology and communicate with the sphere you serve.
You watch interview after interview with coaches on this site when they talk about the B70 and other suits (LZR too) and they admit that the dang suit makes you float. There was one that I recall on the top of my head with KING where they even have suit day b/c they know the suits change your body positon by "floating" and they need to work on those new strokes. The rules clearly say no flotation devices. Test or not...coach after coach (myself include) and countless swimmers admit that they float and make them float better. That is just not working within the rules and integrity of our sport.
Oh will everyone stop crying about the swim suits, and just get back to swimming. What do you want next ... to be allowed to put an outboard motor on the back of suits and think that its the talent of the swimmer. Which part does everyone not understand? The rules say "no devices that create buoyancy" ... the suits create additional buoyancy ... that's the facts. Get over it, and just start swimming.
We are getting a lot of support and it really has helped.. So, I wanted to just say THANK YOU to everyone! Have a safe and happy memorial weekend. And good luck to those of you swimming in blueseventy's at the JEI this weekend and of course other meets around the world!
And best of luck especially to the breaststrokers!! Ya know I love them the best!!
Roque
If what you're saying is true, then this situation stinks more than it does from our perspective out here in the states. I too could honestly care less what is legal and what is not, but for FINA to approve a suit, then turn around and ban it AFTER it has taken a hefty chunk of the market share is quite suspicious. And the fact that we still don't know what is exactly legal and what isn't could possibly be another tactic by the Speedo/FINA mafia attempting to create panic and make people go out and buy the only suit they know for a fact is legal...the LZR.
Others have mentioned it, Speedo is going to have to do a heck of a lot to dig itself out of this hole and gain the respect of swimmers again.
The FS pro was the start of a bad thing in swimming. It's disgusting that we have to worry about our competitions suits rather than the work we've put in the pool. I say ban them all!
Thank you for speaking out. I think the actions you describe are just the tip of the iceberg. Back in the early 80's my coach was paid $70k/year by Speedo. Who knows what Speedo is paying its coaches now? We deserve to know who is on their payroll and what roll these coaches played in the FINA fiasco. We need to demand full financial disclosure and transparency.
Blue70 is an open water company. They should never have entered the pool market in the first place. The LZR opened the floodgates. The whole Blue70 concept is rubber/neoprene and has no place in competitive pool swimming. Too bad the LZR didn't get the boot as well, but I think Blue70 can modify their suits all they want, if it contains any non-permeable material, it should not get approved.
I am an Australian Coach with swimmers at both junior and senior nationals level.
I personally really don’t care which suits my athletes wear provided they are happy.
Those of us without our head in the sand have watched this Blueseventy sage unfold from months and months ago. I have been reading and watching the blogs mentioned below . The scaq article a week or so back on “fiddling” really pricked my conscious and finally I cannot keep quiet - You just don’t know the half of it.
This whole plot was hatched last year.
By December 2008 Blueseventy was developing real acceptance and at the Qld Sate champs maybe 2/3 of the finalists were in these suits. The suit was seen as fast as the LZR but the popularity at age level was because the suit cost less, lasted longer, was reliable and easily available ! My parents loved it. National Head Coach Allan Thompson unusually was on deck for this week. He was quite open in going around telling coaches and swimmers that the blueseventy suit was to be banned. By the end of the week the SAL board had been assembled at the venue and within a day of the meets finish he was quite correct . They passed a ruling banning the use of zips in all suits for all age groups 18 &U;. This effectively took Blueseventy brand and its only suits right out of the volume aussie age group market in one foul swoop. The reasons they gave were without any real foundation and incredibly transparent. Few bought into it , we all knew what had gone down.
However the Blueseventy suit still continued to gain momentum with senior national level swimmers especially because of support. However during this time Mr Thompson was contacting us and talking about trapping of air in suits. The comment amongst coaches was he is “rallying support” but we didn’t quite understand for what.
So came the Dubai Charter and then came our Champs and World Trials in March.
On the second day of the trials swimmers in blueseventy won three events in a row in National and two Commonwealth records. Huge media exposure - it was the talking point on the deck.
The next day Speedo and Thompson swung into action.
At scheduled and impromptu coaches meetings he made it quite clear that the blueseventy suit was to be banned for Rome and coaches and athletes needed to wary. We just watched as coaches and swimmers abandoned the suits and medallists that didn’t were told to roll their suits down before fronting the media. That week he was really focused and he kept plugging away at the suit and air trapping .
In retrospect he already knew what the Fina outcome was to be back then ?
This must have been orchestrated months and months ago when they had to get the right presence on the Fina boards and to think we supported and voted him in there!
They knew the suit would pass the tests so they created a test of opinion it couldn’t pass.
Do i think Fina were complicit, actually no, I think they were totally hoodwinked. See we have never seen a brand really challenge Speedo like this in its own domain of competitive swimming in 20 years , so some of us coaches think this was all set up from last year, to leave Speedo as last man standing. Actually we know it ! Over the years Speedo have had no real fear from TYR and Arena but in just 12 months Blueseventy changed that. They had to pull the Fina approval system down and the have it reassembled to suit them?
A few simple questions on the above will reveal and verify its integrity and accuracy. Even media reports show Thompsons outspoken support of Speedo and the LZR before and after nomination to the Fina suits committee and there’s more, much more ! Like asking only blueseventy representative athletes, to express in writing what sensation the suit gave them, such replies no doubt being edited and selectively tabled at the Fina meeting. And so on ...............
I wish i could reveal my name but to do so i will be vilified. Speedo and Thompson take no prisoners and it will have a direct affect on my family, club and swimmers not excluding the SAL controlled and nominated subsidies and grants we need to receive.
Relieved Aussie Coach
http://scaq.blogspot.com/ Subject: Re: Fwd: FINA and ALan Thompson - I do a post accusing Speedo of fiddling with the process Writer is Tony Austin
http://thewaterisopen.blogspot.com/
http://www.floswimming.org/videos/speaker/3661-steve-nicholls/180522-blueseventys-response-to-finas-ruling
where did you hear that from i would like to know? at the olympics and the last world championships speedo had a room where any swimmer could come in and try out a suit for free. does that not mean they were 'wearing a free Speedo'. a similar arrangment will be present in Rome so any swimmer can choose to wear a LZR if they wish.
But that still doesn't mean they shouldn't be illegal.
nike discontinued their competitive swim suit line. you are very smart.
Does anyone else wonder why there are no Nike suits on the approved list? Do they "trap air" too? And you can still race in practice suits, right?
Not many people will be wearing a free Speedo suit in Rome, I've heard that only 3 people in the world get them for free: Phelps, Lochte, and Hoff. Everyone else pays full price or gets a slight discount. $peedo will do anything to make a profit.
Does anyone else wonder why there are no Nike suits on the approved list? Do they "trap air" too? And you can still race in practice suits, right?
Not many people will be wearing a free Speedo suit in Rome, I've heard that only 3 people in the world get them for free: Phelps, Lochte, and Hoff. Everyone else pays full price or gets a slight discount. $peedo will do anything to make a profit.
Not many people will be wearing a free Speedo suit in Rome, I've heard that only 3 people in the world get them for free: Phelps, Lochte, and Hoff. Everyone else pays full price or gets a slight discount. $peedo will do anything to make a profit.
FINA said the times won't count, but the Italians are insisting that they wear the suit (if the swimmer so chooses) regardless of whether it is banned.
unreal.
strategy 1: popped seams and poor manufacturing adds holes to the suit which eliminate the trapping air
result 1: no worries about the "suit standards" that "FINA" makes up (or at least does a copy/paste from what we send them.
strategy 2: low grade materials and sweatshop labor make huge margins
result 2: we can own EVERYONE... swimming is a sport without the huge contracts of football or baseball, a little cash goes a long way in the world of competitive swimming.
strategy 3: low ball everyone, meet sponsorships, clubs, anyone who could use the revenue to promote the sport
result 3: we don't need to pay huge exclusivity rights to anyone, we just need to give them $1 more than anyone else will... which in swimming isn't much...
you're all a bunch of fools.. this is easier than being a real estate mogul in a third world country...
CA-CHING! Pay Up $UCKA$
I am afraid it's not goiing to matter if FINA is going to roll us back to jammers and briefs.
To add to your thought, how about all suit companies come together (minus speedo of course) and create some sort of unified "swim league", hold their own meets, have their own set of records (no one can complain about the old records anymore getting beat anymore), self regulate their suits, and either over throw FINA and speedo or get them to realize that their good ole boy thing they got going isn't helping the sport. and get back on the boat and play nice. Its funny in sports competition is the main thing, yet speedo will not compete with other companies. If i was a rich mofo I'd start my own swim federation right now, but i'm not so I can olny dream. And I know i am bashing speedo and FINA but if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck....... A happy thursday to all! godspeed!
This may seem like an absurd question, but with all of the shady dealings going on with FINA and Speedo it started getting me thinking. Just how difficult would it be for some people go about creating a new "FINA" or new governing body for swimming. It just seems to me that this whole suit issue has created some deep divides in the swimming world and has and will continue to cause people to lose respect for both FINA and Speedo. I even read that Italy will still allow their athletes to wear Jaked's for their World Champ Trials and that Japan will ratify Irie's swim as a Japanese record despite the issue of the suits legality. That just seems to reinforce the idea that FINA is not trusted or respected by many coaches or swimmers and I feel like it would be difficult to maintain a working relationship between FINA and other federations in the future. Plus, the people who work at FINA practically know nothing of swimming, all they really care about is making money.
"The Major Traditional Swimsuit partners of the world of swimming are happy to adjust their manufacturing to meet the FINA requirements with the caveat that an 18-24 month development cycle for new products will be heavily stressed with our initial phases. This is a hardship for them, financially and operationally. Also no doubt, some newer players in the market that I categorize as “in it for the fast buck”, will be done in by the new rules and will not be happy. And because they are in it for the quick buck and not for development of the sport longterm, they may well take their unhappiness to a court of law to try to find their “quick buck”. Shame on them if they do." [my emphasis]
It's here http://www.swimmingcoach.org/ (posted March 4). I thought this smelled at the time, and it smells even more now. Is this about creating a fair playing ground or punishing the upstarts? Huh, seems like the latter to me.
BlueSeventy all the way!!!
yeah youre right, changing body position is illegal...o wait no its not. And over half of the world records were set in LZR, so how again are these other suits faster? The Jaked, B70 and Titan are all made with primarily rubber material and traps in air, lzrs have holes in the groin to release trapped air and water, so therefore the air bubble and material make them float. Ive worn a blue70 and a lzr, going fast in both, including a NAG record in the blue70, so I'm not hating just telling the truth. You can definitely feel the suit and the trapped air helping you float with the blue or should I say buoy70.
Thanks for the posts, nice to see such a proactive community both for and against.
To clear up a few points mentioned below:
1/ Our suit passed the buoyancy and thickness tests, it does not float, and is not a wetsuit.
2/ the materials in the jaked suit are (to my knowledge) not chloroprene like the our blueseventy nero suits or the TYR titan.
3/ We launched a buy back program 2-3 weeks ago I believe, where any suits bought between now and the end of the year we would buuy back at approx 50% of the purchase price applied as a credit on the 2010 FINA legal model.
4/ Interesting the comments re: pockets of air being the reason the suit is fast... one of the most popular strokes for our suit has been breaststroke, while I'll not admit to being a total swim geek and having intimate knowledge of breaststroke stroke mechanics, my discussions with athletes on product design has been that of all the strokes this is the one that has the most time underwater.... which would kind of mean that buoyancy assistance is not an advantage...thoughts....
If you have any other questions regarding the suits you would like answered please feel free to mail me:
, check our website, or our blog...
its terrible to see swimming governed by FINA like this
"it changes body position"
That's why it should be banned. All of the suits that were as fast or faster than the LZR (not to mention less expensive) were banned. TYR Titan, Jaked J01, B70. The sayonara is for triathlons, not swimming. I don't think it is on the approved list.
"You idiots" say
if you've ever looked at a blue seventy, it's a full on wetsuit. Even if they pass this year, it'd only be good till the end of the year.
You are most likely some sponsored athlete from another brand you has never been allowed to put the suit on because if you knew anything about wetsuit or felt one or been in it and then got into the bluesventy nero you would not make such an ignorant comment...!!! put the suit on foryouself first.....thats the problem people who just make assumptions without doing a reality check...
"The suit makers need to know exactly what is allowed and what isn't and this shouldn't be a moving target."
this is exactly the complication...the fact that it passsed all the set out tests on what was provided for it to be on the "list" and then suits that are made in the same factory and have less market share or have less of any impact on the swimming market have passed.
Peeople think its a debate about suits being banned or not..its about why was blueseventy singled out...why did they not get put on teh okay list when other suits which yes are competition to speedo but have not made the same impact. And actually other than TYR being big in america they are insignificant in most of the other swimming nations like Australia where blueseventy has taken a massive chunk of market share from speedo..why? not cause of the suit being better but because Blueseventy cares about swimmers and shows this by their people and not having the price of their race suits sky rocket as though they not available to everyone. I think this is the problem that blueseventy is getting subjected to unfair rulings because it is actually making a
"real difference in the swimming world", I mean who does not know Roque and his team at meets?? they will go out of their way to do anything for swimmers because swimming and the community of swimming is their life..so I think this goes alot deeper than just a suit issue!!!!
no, becuase the nero wouldn't be approved, the revised nero would be approved.
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/athletesfirst/
Anyway... Who cares if Speedo gives a lot of money to Fina or does fantastic work in the swimming world? That doesn't change anything. The LZR should still be banned.
why should the lzr be banned, it doesnt create buoyancy, it compresses and changes body position to make a swimmer more hydrodrynamic. And as for FINA and Speedo having a secret deal going on, there are over 100 non speedo suits approved including TYR suits (though the titan was banned, their new sayanaru isnt). If speedo wanted their competition out why would they leave one of their biggest competitors in.
That's why it should be banned. All of the suits that were as fast or faster than the LZR (not to mention less expensive) were banned. TYR Titan, Jaked J01, B70. The sayonara is for triathlons, not swimming. I don't think it is on the approved list.
Kirk nailed it: "they need to clearly state the rules and these rules must be testable. The suit makers need to know exactly what is allowed and what isn't and this shouldn't be a moving target."
That is the only way to do it. It is clear now that when the rules are hazy or subject to interpretation, everybody loses...well maybe not everybody.
This is our opportunity to tell FINA what we think. They are accountable to us, and we need to let them know that. There is a petition going around that went live earlier today, basically telling FINA to get itself straight. The link is below, if you agree with some or even part of it, sign it. Just picture a big fat petition getting dumped in their laps...who do you think they will listen to then?
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/athletesfirst/
That is the only way to do it. It is clear now that when the rules are hazy or subject to interpretation, everybody loses...well maybe not everybody.
This is our opportunity to tell FINA what we think. They are accountable to us, and we need to let them know that. There is a petition going around that went live earlier today, basically telling FINA to get itself straight. The link is below, if you agree with some or even part of it, sign it. Just picture a big fat petition getting dumped in their laps...who do you think they will listen to then?
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/athletesfirst/
what company? please...indulge us more on the buy back program.
I'm glad to see that they have a buy back program in place. I can't imagine the number of mid Major, D2, D3, and NAIA schools that went with BlueSeventy because they could get multiple uses out of them and were cheaper. I applaud the company for have the foresight to have that in place.
Blue70 is an open water company. They should never have entered the pool market in the first place.
FINA was more or less forced to enact a better testing protocol for suit approval and I do think they've made a step in the right direction. However, they need to clearly state the rules and these rules must be testable. The suit makers need to know exactly what is allowed and what isn't and this shouldn't be a moving target.
And I apologize for the profanity, but this is just ridiculous
2. can we wear b70s as regular usa swimming meets?
3. has USA swmming made a statement??
Can we go back to the paper suit
1) Last summer i swam my first race in body suit ,a fastskin pro actually, brand new never been worn in the water. swam the 50 free in it. Right off the dive I got a air bubble in my chest, it just so happens i hit the water at the right angle. I think that everyone wearing a body suit in competetion or diving off the blocks has experenced this no matter what the company so I think this is really unfair to B70 to have been failed for that reason. Air can be caught in any body suit because the way the fabric around the neck line is cut and how big your bust/pecks are.
2) For real the jaked suit is like exactly the same as the b70 except it comes in colors and for that matter the TYR's are pretty similiar
3) From my expereince and ppl I have talked to are and have always been more conserend with the core stablizer in the TYR titian and LZR than the "bouncy" of the b70 and other suits
4) I do hope that this has not been a scandle in which speedo and other companies have paid off FINA officals to put an end to b70 because of its recent sucess which is in part due to its NERO Comp and that suits increased popularity. Speedo- I do hopw you know there is a thing such as the serman anti trust act and other laws prohibiting monopolies
And will the records set in them count? All the best times? They are really creating a sticky
Situation for themselves!
everyone is losing respect for SPEEDO i believe that there is going to be a huge drop off of they amount of things they sell very soon because of this
My sport makes me sick.
No matter...99% of people who knew anything about these suits knew B70 wasn't going to pass as it was currently on the market.